Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Brian Moore's avatar

I keep seeing this grounding stuff too, but...

"if there exists a path for the current to ground you through a mat and an electrical outlet, you’re golden."

For this "tribe," I just don't get the steelman case. Sure, you could say "the average person spends a lot less time grounded with their rubber tires and shoes" and that's absolutely true, for whatever that's worth. But... why does the time matter? If I find some way, after being in my car and my shoes, to discharge that uh, charge by accidentally touching a pole or something (in the same way the mat is supposed to work) then surely I'm getting rid of it at the speed of electron transmission? Or when I walk around in my socks or barefeet in my house, or touch any other conductive surface, whoosh out it goes. This seems like every other "correlated with wealth and therefore diseases of civilization" factor that you list many of - that then falls apart when you actually try to measure it/absence-of-it with a properly controlled population.

For the naturalistic one, I am 100% on board with "being outside in the natural world is good and healthy" but how on earth would you disentangle "grounding" effects from that? Whatever method you are gonna have to study this is gonna be confounded by all those really healthy outdoors types who are walking around in insulative hiking boots.

Expand full comment
UNIcodeX's avatar

Now I've got Bohemian Rhapsody in my head. Thanks for that...

Ah. Well.... Easy come easy go.....

Expand full comment
43 more comments...

No posts