21 Comments
User's avatar
Tyler Ransom's avatar

So the end result is, after all of your trial and error, it seems like these refeeds are completely unnecessary?

I wonder if this is more broadly true. For the past ≈9 months I've tried to hit the 1g/lb FitnessBro mark ever day. On average, I've only hit 0.75g/lb.

Your post makes me wonder if the recommendations are way too high and if the body is much more efficient at recycling protein than physicians and scientists believe.

Expand full comment
Kim Nari's avatar

Feel I've seen people actually measure their lean mass before, and realizing that they were losing muscle when not eating enough protein closer to arund ~1g/lb, though this was in indiviudal, lean subjects so that might be why?

There have to be some actual studies out there.

Expand full comment
Experimental Fat Loss's avatar

One issue with the studies is, we don't even have a real way to measure this unless you do it for 6 months. As you can see on my DEXA history, even DEXA is noisy as heck to water/glycogen weight.

I've gained 4.4lbs of "lean mass" in just 24h just by upping my protein previously. I could probably do 15lbs if I really tried.

So how do we know if someone "lost lean mass" unless we let it run for like 6 months and it's way outside of that (5-15lbs?) range?

Expand full comment
Experimental Fat Loss's avatar

> it seems like these refeeds are completely unnecessary?

I.. think so?

Expand full comment
Private Private's avatar

Regarding quantity & timing of protein intake, here's the latest newsletter from Dr. Michael Eades (Protein Power). That content starts at "Dietary Protein and Lean Body Mass."

https://arrow.proteinpower.com/p/arrow-168?utm_source=arrow.proteinpower.com&utm_medium=newsletter&utm_campaign=the-arrow-168

Expand full comment
Experimental Fat Loss's avatar

Ha, interesting. Obviously I disagree with him on many things there.

Yea, obviously don't lose weight by cutting calories & chugging shakes with sunflower and canola oil (https://www.nestlehealthscience.ca/en/brands/optifast/optifast-900-hcp). If you do so, you'll lose lean mass and your metabolic rate will decrease.

Expand full comment
Kim Nari's avatar

Not a surprising read, but good read nonetheless, thanks. ^^

Expand full comment
Aaron's avatar

Re the body maintaining adaptive levels of glycogen stores, I think this was my experience even when water fasting. I’m a runner and would still be able to run for around 3k at a slow pace (15-20mins) before bonking but my heart rate was elevated throughout, suggesting to me that it was still utilising more fat that normal to propel me. I think that matches what you’re seeing. You’re just running out more quickly and so with fuller stores you’re now superman. Makes me wonder what would happen to your weight if you upped glycogen and training.

Expand full comment
Experimental Fat Loss's avatar

I'd likely gain 10lbs immediately, and gain way more muscle way more quickly :D

Water fasting is similar for me, I'd lose a lot of weight but then it'd come back very quickly.

Expand full comment
Aaron's avatar

Sounds like a good test :)

Expand full comment
Experimental Fat Loss's avatar

I'll do it when I get lean enough that muscle building becomes my priority haha

Expand full comment
Donald Hennings's avatar

I wonder, if you aren't losing muscle mass, do you actually need the refeeding to be so high as I understand we cannot store protein and converting excess protein to glucose is very inefficient for humans to do?

Professor Tim Noakes has recently been doing some experiments regarding carb loading. If I read the results correctly as long as you are fat adapted there is no advantage to carb loading. For extreme exercise (5+ hours), there is a benefit to a small amount of glucose (20g) taken during the exercise which is necessary for the brain, not the muscles.

Indeed, salmon does taste much better than sardines.

Expand full comment
Experimental Fat Loss's avatar

Probably don't need to, yea. I dunno at this point I'm kind of over the protein refeeds, but then I do love cheese so it's a bit of a "vent" planned "cheat day" outlet too..

Expand full comment
Aaron's avatar

I do extreme exercise by that measure and you need much more than 20g carbs per hour to propel you

Expand full comment
Donald Hennings's avatar

I suggest you read the research of professor Tim Noakes for a full explanation.

If you are fat adopted you can get all the energy you need from fat except for the 20 grams of carbs mentioned.

Expand full comment
Chris Highcock's avatar

I’m not sure why you are doing the refeeds. If you note that a benefit to your training is that you had additional glycogen why not just eat carbs?

Expand full comment
Experimental Fat Loss's avatar

When I started, I wasn't sure I wouldn't die from this :)

People on Twitter are still telling me that what I'm doing is extremely dangerous.

But yea they do seem unnecessary now?

Expand full comment
Chris Highcock's avatar

And the idea of eating carbs?

Expand full comment
Experimental Fat Loss's avatar

Would be interesting if I can "sink" the carbs I eat into the muscle (glycogen) and if that doesn't kick me out of ketosis enough to mess with my sleep.. that's the primary reason I probably won't try it soon; muscle gain is just not a focus right now, and anything that messes with my sleep is a risky experiment haha.

Expand full comment
Chris Highcock's avatar

So your concern with ketosis is for sleep health not about fat loss?

Expand full comment